European Medical Organizations Reaffirm Support for Gender-Affirming Care
EU Medical Groups Back Gender Care
A Critical Response to the UK’s Cass Review
A recent report published by several European medical organizations highlights the importance of gender-affirming care for transgender youth. This 400-page document, developed by 26 medical and psychotherapeutic associations from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria, also criticizes the UK’s Cass Review, which claims that gender-affirming care may be harmful.
Recommendations for Puberty Blockers and Personalized Care
According to an analysis by transgender journalist Erin Reed, this German-language report supports the use of puberty blockers and recommends individualized treatment. It emphasizes the need for swift access to medical and psychotherapeutic treatment when long delays could lead to irreversible bodily changes, such as voice deepening. The document asserts that the well-being of transgender youth depends on timely and appropriate medical intervention.
Criticism of the Psychotherapy-First Approach Advocated by the Cass Review
The European report challenges the Cass Review’s recommendation of psychotherapy as an alternative to gender-affirming care. It argues that none of the studies included in the UK review demonstrate a reduction in gender dysphoria through psychotherapy alone. This stance sharply contrasts with the Cass Review, which calls for "extreme caution" in administering puberty blockers or hormone replacement therapy to minors.
Trans Activists Oppose the Cass Review’s Conclusions
The conclusions of the Cass Review have sparked strong reactions from trans activists, who criticize the exclusion of numerous studies showing the benefits of gender-affirming care. Erin Reed pointed out that the review incorporates concepts rejected by more than 60 mental health organizations, including the American Psychological Association.
A Turning Point for Trans Healthcare in Europe
Reed views these new guidelines as a significant step forward for trans healthcare in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. She argues that the recommendations contradict the narrative that Europe is restricting access to gender-affirming care. Instead, she asserts that the United States is taking a more restrictive approach to trans healthcare policies.
A Lack of Media Coverage Criticized
Finally, Reed criticizes the lack of media attention surrounding the release of this European report. On Bluesky, she highlights the stark contrast between the widespread media coverage of the Cass Review and the near-total silence on this pro-trans healthcare report. She questions the selective nature of media reporting on transgender health issues.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire